Sea Demonstration of T.E.D. was conducted on Dt.11.02.2002 in four Trawlers fitted with and without T.E.D.. Inorder to motivate and giving their(Trawler Owners) personal views, the official of the Institute who designed the T.E.D. model to suit the coastal waters of India and the media persons were present at the time of demonstration in order to convince and interacting themselves to show the benefits and loss for long term Instainability of Fisheries and conservation of the Marine Eco-System. For the purpose, the following no. of personnels from the different sector were involved.
| Different Sector | No. of Persons. | |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | Deptt. of Fisheries | 10 |
| 2. | Deptt. of Forest | 03 |
| 3. | Wild Life Institute of India | 03 |
| 4. | Ministry of Agriculture, Govt. of India. | 01 |
| 5. | C.I.F.T Govt. of India | 01 |
| 6. | F.S.I., Govt. of India. | 02 |
| 7. | Media Persons. | 09 |
| 8. | Trawler Owners. | 06 |
| 9. | N.G.Os. | 04 |
| --------------- | ||
| Total : | 38 |
The trawling operation was conducted at a distance of 12-13 Kms from the Shore at an average depth of 15 Fathom. The details of observation at the end of the page.
Form the observation, it reveals that the percentage of fish loss varies from 1.96 to 14.83 with an average of 7.2% and smooth release of turtle in now of the 4 trial made. Hence , it is placed for discussion between the resource persons and users.
| First Haul | Second Haul | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name of the Fishing Vessel | Condition of Fishing | Weight of Fish in main code end. | Weight of Fish in extra code end. | % of Fish escaped through TED | No. of Turtles escaped through TED | Condition of fishing | Weight of fish in main cod end. | Wight of fish in extra cod end. | % fish escaped through TED. |
| M.V.TELABON | With TED fitted with extra cod end | Kg 41.7 | Kg 2.6 | 5.87% | Nil | Fitted with TED without extra cod end | Kg.23.0 | Nil | Nil |
| M.V DEVAPUJYA | With TED fitted with extra cod end | Kg 5.0 | Kg 0.1 | 1.96% | Nil | Fitted with TED with extra cod end | Kg 75.0 | Kg3.0 | 3.35% |
| M.V DEVASABYA | Without TED | Kg 51.6 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Without TED | Kg131.8 | Nil | Nil |
| M.V CROWN | Without TED | Kg 54.8 | Nil | Nil | Nil | With TED and extra cod end | Kg.40.2 | Kg 7.0 | 14.83% |
| First Haul | Second Haul | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fishing Vessel | Condition of Fishing | Weight of Fish in main code end (kg.) | Weight of fish in the exit hole cover | % of fish escaped through the exit cover | No.of Turtles escaped | Condition of fishing | Weight of fish in the main cod end | Weight of fish in the exit hole cover | % of fish escaped through the exit cover | No. of Turtles escaped | Remarks |
| M.V.TELABON | Trawl fitted with TED with extra cod end | 41.7 | 2.6 | 5.87% | Nil | Trawl fitted with TED with no extra cod end | 23.3 | Nil | Nil | Nil | In the 2nd haul escapement could not be calculated as there was no extra cod |
| M.V DEBAPUJYA | With TED fitted with extra cod end | 5.0 | 0.1 | 1.96% | Nil | Fitted with TED with extra cod end | 75 | 3.0 | 3.85% | One | Catch loss 2.4% |
| M.V DEVASABYA | Without TED | 5.6 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Without TED | 131.8 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Cannot estimate catch loss as there was no extra cod end attached |
| M.V CROWN | Without TED | 54.4 | Nil | Nil | Nil | Trawl fitted with TED &with extra cod end | 40.2 | 7.0 | 14.83% | Nil | The accelerator funnel and exit hole flap were out. |